Why I’m glad there hasn’t been a Black Widow movie… yet

Before I get down to the main topic of this post I want to make one thing clear. I am going to discuss a topic related to gender inequality in cinema. While I have read and reread it before posting in an attempt to ensure that I haven’t said anything that means something other than I think it does, that doesn’t mean I won’t say something inadvertently stupid or offensive.

So, just to be clear, I am in no way intending to defend Marvel Studios’ obvious issues with gender equality. There is a whole ream of blog posts to be written on Marvel’s failure to address the cultural hangover of their 1960’s heritage. The fact that it will be an entire decade over the MCU’s existence (1) before they release a movie with a solo female lead is ridiculous, and the state the merchandising is in would be funny if it wasn’t so depressingly sad.

So please forgive me if I inadvertently say anything that sounds like I am defending them on this. That is not my intention.

In the “geek” community there is currently a lot of anger surrounding the way woman are being depicted in comics. Both in written and cinematic form it is obvious that gender balance issues still exist. As I stated above, I’m not going to attempt to go into too much detail about this, because (a) I know more intelligent people than me are putting it a lot better than I would, and (b) I’d inevitably say something that means something other than what I meant.

What I want to discuss today revolves around one of the more prominent focus points of this argument; that fact that in the Marvel Cinematic Universe there has yet to be a female lead solo movie, and that the most prominent female character in the series, Natasha Romanov, the Black Widow, has been repeatedly relegated to a supporting role

a5d12ecyo9lleypvfs8o

But here’s the thing. I’m glad she hasn’t had her own movie, because without one she has become the most interesting character in the MCU.

I personally believe that Black Widow has had – possibly inadvertently – the best character development in the entire series. One thing Marvel has done well with their secondary characters in the MCU – and yes, at this point I wouldn’t call her secondary, but let us for now assume “secondary” means that they haven’t had their own movie – is develop them across multiple movies. I have always been a fan of reoccurring background characters. The ones who aren’t part of the main plot but appear throughout a series. It gives a story a sense of continuity. A feel that the world carries on while the heroes are busy doing their thing (2). Part of the reason the MCU came together so well was characters like Natasha Romanov, Nick Fury, Phil Coulson (3), and Maria Hill brought everything together. It wasn’t just the ‘Big Three’: Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor, each working with interchangeable, faceless extras. They were part of a world that existed independently from them.

And some secondary characters grow to be come more prominent. Not all, but Natasha was one that did, until she was one of the main characters in the first Avengers movie. And that slow development – spread out over time rather than dumped on us in one go – has allowed her a layer of mystery the others are lacking. The Big Three Avengers are clear cut characters. They may have layers and development, and the actors do a great job of making them three dimensional, but we always know who and what they are. There is no mystery to them. Romanov isn’t like that. She’s not a celebrity, soldier, or god. She’s a spy. An enigma. Her entire life has been about deception. Whatever the situation has needed, that’s who she has become. Her scenes with Bruce Banner in Age of Ultron were probably the first time the audience have seen her completely honest and bare. We’ve slowly learned snatches of her history, but no more than that.

Then there is the fact that she isn’t really a “super” hero. Rather than gaining her abilities through some accident of birth or genius, she will have spent a life time training to become who she is. She’s not a demigod. She doesn’t focus on her own problems and adventures over anything else. She’s not so powerful that it’s impossible for her not to be the centre of the world around her. She goes where she’s needed, doing what’s needed to do.

And that leads to the fact that she is one of only two Avengers with no powers (4). Damage or injury that the others would shake off without thinking would kill Romanov or Hawkeye. But she keeps up with them. She chooses to keep up with them. No one would think less of her for letting the actual “super” members of the team take them lead, and than follow to mop up after them. What sort of person is she that she doesn’t?

And for one last point – and I know some people will disagree with me on this – I feel it’s important to recognise that she’s never been anyone’s sidekick. In Iron Man 2 she turns up as a spy, completely showing up everyone who underestimate her because they couldn’t see past her appearance. In Captain American: Winter Soldier Steve Rogers only succeeds because she is there at times to take the lead. She’s doing her job, which involves working with the others. She’s not working for them.

Remember, Black Widow was originally a bad guy. Assuming that they are keeping that back story – and I think that’s a safe assumption from what we’ve seen – she was a killer for the KGB. An assassin. She has red in her ledger. She was offered a second chance, and now does what she does now in an attempt to make up for her past actions. She doesn’t believe that she deserves to ever get to quit and live happily ever after.

As I said earlier, Black Widow is the most interesting character in the entire MCU.

It boils down to this: unlike with the other characters, as an audience we have had have to fill in the gaps in her story ourselves. We’ve had to use our imaginations to build up a picture of who she is from the little we’ve seen. With each appearance we see a little more, and build up our own personal interpretation of her backstory. It’s that interaction with the character that make her who she is. If we had been given a solo movie too soon, I don’t know if this would have been handled so well.

But I do have to say that this doesn’t let Marvel off the hook. I argue that her slow buildup made her a better character. That having her own film would have ruined this. However this is (a) no excuse for not introducing another female lead, and (b) no longer the case.

I can understand how the MCU ‘Phase 1’ was focused on the three main – male – heroes. They were the tentpoles of the franchise. I can forgive them that. But there was no excuse for not bringing one in for ‘Phase 2’. There is no excuse for waiting until the end of ‘Phase 3’ before we get Captain Marvel, or indeed develop Black Widow into her own story.

And now the mystique is established, Black Widow could easily slip fully formed into her own movie. We now have enough of an idea of her that we want to see more, not because we want a female lead movie on principle, but because the character calls for it. In the correct hands, with a writer and director who understand who to handle the character and don’t simply try to shoehorn her into an cut and paste action adventure, it could be amazing. It needs to be a spy thriller. Captain America: Winter Soldier showed Marvel that their fans can enjoy an action move tinted with political intrigue. A Black Widow movie with just be one step further along that road. It needs to answer some questions while leaving more open. Think of how Wolverine’s story was left at the end of Xmen 2. We knew more than we did, but there was so many more questions left unanswered. The answers we had were satisfying, but the character was still left with some mystery (5). The moment they simply decide to spell her out, the character would be ruined.

Actually, I don’t want her to have a movie. I want her to have a series, a la Agent Carter. And it should be on Netflix so it can be dark and gritty. Marvel have shown that can get the perfect mix of dark and fun with Daredevil. She needs story and character development, not just a series of fights and explosions.

The fan base is ready for it. There's a story to be told.

The fan base is ready for it. There’s a story to be told.

So come on, Marvel. All the elements are there. Time to make up for your lack of care with your female characters. Make it up to up with something awesome.

1 I mean since Iron Man. I’m not counting to two original Hulk movies because, well, who does?

2 Wedge Antillies is the best character in the original Star Wars trilogy. Why does not one else see this? Come on, he survives both Death Star runs!

3 Who should have stayed dead. People disagree. They are wrong. There will possibly be a future post on this.

4 I’m counting super genius and a metal suit that turns you into a superman as a “power” here. Go with it.

5 Xmen: The Last Stand and Xmen Origins: Wolverine DID NOT HAPPEN! Why do people labour under this delusion?

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Why I’m glad there hasn’t been a Black Widow movie… yet

  1. I actually agree that not having a Black Widow movie in Phase one or two was a good thing. Not just for the reasons you mentioned, but also because Black Widow wasn’t that well-known before we got this incarnation of her. Marvel first had to built up some cred and then used “Guardians of the Galaxy” as some sort of test balloon if they could go obscure for their titles. If it had failed, no harm done. But it worked. And at this point they should have announced a Black Widow movie for phase 3. And yes, it should have been a Spy thriller, preferable one which is a clever mixture of James Bond and Jason Borne, with a healthy dose film noir thrown in for good measure. I certainly don’t want her in a Netflix setting though, simply because I don’t think that the Black Widow mythology would be enough to fill a whole series. Plus, it would be confusing. Netflix is “Defenders”-land. (I really hope that Aka Jessica Jones turns out to be at least as good as Agent Carter).

    Oh, and the Incredible Hulk counts, the other one doesn’t, though.

    • I definitely agree about her being not well known enough during Phase 1, but I think they could have done something during Phase 2, after she had been decently established as a main – and popular – character. Phase 3 is probably better for her I think, but they could have brought someone else in to Phase 2.

      Maybe not a full series, but maybe something short, say over three or four episodes. Kind of a step above the one-shots they released during Phase 1 but not quite to the level of the Defenders series titles.

      (I have to admit my opinion of Agent Carter is based on hearsay, because for some inexplicable reason it is still not available in the UK! But I don’t think I’ve heard a bad thing about it yet.)

  2. You write very well, and haven’t said anything accidentally bad that I can see. But I disagree entirely.

    People forget that Iron Man was obscure until his first film, except to existing marvel comic fans. Basically anyone who knew who Iron Man was before his film would also know who Black Widow was. An early Black Widow film would have been entirely possible and a good thing. Much better than her introduction in Iron Man 2, which started with her cover as a lingerie model, had Tony Stark say ‘I want one’ as if she’s a purchasable object, and when she finally gets to be badass its only after a scene of her changing in the back of a car and nearly causing a crash from the distracted male (never mind his boss and friend is under attack, he still gets distracted by semi-naked woman because its ‘funny’).

    If you wanted to keep her mystery early on, there could instead have been a ‘Shield Film’ introducing both Black Widow and Hawkeye, and giving us a little more of what SHIELD looked like back when it was still secret (either as precursor to Agents of Shield or even as a replacement, since you wanted Coulson to stay dead).

    It’s now, with Black Widow established, that a solo film wouldn’t work as well. If she had a solo film before Infinity War she’d either spend it looking for Banner/Hulk (so the entire first female MCU solo film is spent obsessing over a man), or the audience would be wondering where Banner/Hulk is all the time (because that story is interesting and the first time she’s shown vulnerability). Also she’s been shown as deeply involved with training the new set of Avengers, so having her get plausible IC ‘time off’ for this would be a potential issue, unless they do a prequel and cause timeline confusion.

    If she has a solo film after Infinity War then anything a non-superpowered spy can do or face would seem feeble after Thanos (to be honest I think *anything* would seem feeble after Thanos, I have no idea how the MCU can avoid dying with a whimper after Infinity War part 2, since they seem set on continuing beyond it).

    Anyway, that’s my opinion. I appreciate it is no more than a opinion, and no more valid than yours.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s